Hardware Comparison
Winner: nRF52840 (score 90 vs 80)
| Spec | STM32F4 | nRF52840 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | STMicroelectronics | Nordic Semiconductor |
| Architecture | ARM Cortex-M4F @ 168 MHz | ARM Cortex-M4F @ 64 MHz |
| SRAM | 192 KB | 256 KB |
| Flash | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| ML Acceleration | DSP, FPU | DSP, FPU |
| Connectivity | USB OTG FS | Bluetooth 5.0 LE, 802.15.4 (Thread/Zigbee), NFC, USB 2.0 |
| Chip Price | $3-10 | $5-8 |
| Sound Classification Score | 80 (Excellent) | 90 (Excellent) |
The nRF52840 edges ahead for sound classification with a compatibility score of 90 vs 80 for the STM32F4. However, each platform has distinct advantages depending on deployment requirements. Memory: The STM32F4 provides 192 KB SRAM, while the nRF52840 offers 256 KB. For sound classification's 64 KB minimum requirement, the nRF52840 offers more margin. Performance: The STM32F4 runs at 168 MHz (cortex-m4f, DSP) vs the nRF52840 at 64 MHz (cortex-m4f, DSP). The STM32F4's significantly higher clock speed translates to faster inference. Connectivity: STM32F4 offers USB OTG FS. nRF52840 provides Bluetooth 5.0 LE, 802.15.4 (Thread/Zigbee), NFC, USB 2.0. Cost: STM32F4 chips run $3-10 (dev boards $10-30), while nRF52840 chips cost $5-8 (dev boards $20-35). The STM32F4 is more cost-effective for volume deployments. Choose the STM32F4 when: cost optimization is critical, the STMicroelectronics ecosystem fits your toolchain, or hardware variety is important (105 PlatformIO boards). Choose the nRF52840 when: you need maximum RAM headroom, Zephyr RTOS and BLE are priorities, or you need built-in 9-axis imu (lsm9ds1) on arduino nano 33 ble.
Use the MCU Compatibility Checker to compare all supported hardware for your specific use case.
Open MCU Checker